Valve proof check credit for a course of trip

A course of trip happens when the protection instrumented system (SIS) locations the method in its secure state by commanding an automatic valve (Figure 1) or other gear to its trip state in response to an abnormal course of situation. In some cases, a spurious journey happens due to a valve malfunction. In that case, the valve meeting is examined under real operating circumstances, which offers an opportunity to capture useful valve diagnostic information.
However, such diagnostics data can solely be captured when automated valves are fitted with digital valve controllers (DVCs). In this text, we’ll discuss how DVCs may help decide the proof check credit score for an automatic valve after a process trip.
Process journey
A course of journey happens when the SIS detects an irregular process condition by way of sensors corresponding to temperature and strain, executes the logic and places the process in its safe state by tripping the ultimate components similar to closing an automated valve, stopping a pump, and so on. The SIS might communicate with the Basic Process Control System (BPCS) to close a valve downstream of the automated valve as a secondary motion.
When a course of journey happens, the principle objective is often to restart the unit or equipment that has been shut down as quickly as attainable. Plant engineers are busy troubleshooting and correcting problems. Maintenance technicians are busy repairing damaged gadgets. Taking the opportunity to proof test an automated valve won’t be a top precedence and even an exercise into consideration because of the tight schedule after an unplanned shutdown.
Fortunately, if the automated valve is equipped with a DVC, the proof take a look at of the valve can be considered carried out with diagnostic knowledge captured by the DVC. Also, a comparison of the diagnostic knowledge with the valve’s baseline can help uncover valve deficiencies and degradations that received’t present up in a proof test.
Figure 2. Proof Test vs Process Trip. Activities carried out (such as repairing the device) and data captured by a Fisher DVC6200 SIS digital valve controller throughout a course of journey meet most of the 12 requirements of a proof check.
Process journeys versus proof checks
How can proof take a look at credits be claimed for an automatic valve that has failed and brought on a course of trip? A proof take a look at is a periodic take a look at performed on SIS sensors, logic solvers and ultimate elements — similar to automated valves — to find hidden failures. These failures, if not corrected or eliminated, may impair the ability of the SIS to take the process to its secure state when an irregular course of condition is detected.
A proof check should be carried out as per the proof take a look at interval specified within the Safety Requirement Specifications. This interval is usually decided by way of a mean chance of failure on demand calculation (PFDavg). Some users may select to proof test based on predetermined intervals, similar to proof testing sensors each 24 months and last components each forty eight months as an alternative of counting on the PFDavg calculations.
Automated valve proof checks may be accomplished offline or online. Offline proof tests are normally scheduled during a turnaround, when the method is totally shut down.
Proof testing an automatic valve online often requires a unit or gear to be shut down, or the valve to be bypassed to stop a spurious journey, making it inconvenient and costly.
But a proof test may also be completed during a process trip.
According to IEC61511-2 Section A.16.3.1.three, “…shutdowns as a outcome of precise demand on the SIS during operation may be given credit as proof tests (fully or partial) under given conditions…the subsequent deliberate proof take a look at could additionally be skipped.”
These circumstances are
The shutdown paperwork equivalent information as registered throughout corresponding proof check.
The shutdown covers all elements of the SIS, and if not, the system or SIS subsystem not activated needs to be examined individually.
The shutdown occurs within a predetermined most time window earlier than the subsequent planned proof test which might then be canceled
When a process journey happens, about 60% of a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) proof take a look at may be considered performed. A pattern record of actions carried out throughout a proof test, together with those that are performed throughout a course of trip, is proven in Figure 2. Even without an automated valve leak check, information captured by the DVC alone can potentially account for a good amount of proof take a look at protection for an automatic valve.
The precise protection depends on the design of the automated valve, its DVC and its utility. The protection is estimated primarily based on the valve degradations, the chance of their incidence and the percentage of these degradations that can be detected by a DVC. Fortunately, information acquired by a DVC during a course of journey can often be enough to fulfill a significant part of the proof test necessities.
If the method trip takes place within a predetermined maximum time window, the tip consumer might choose to leverage the method journey as a proof check by completing steps one by way of 5 in Figure 2, which are usually not accomplished in a course of journey. The next scheduled proof check can then be canceled. According to the Norwegian Oil Industry Association, the maximum time window ought to be the final half of the present proof take a look at interval.
Figure 3. Data during a course of journey is captured by the Fisher DVC6200 SIS digital valve controller and made out there for evaluation.
Common causes of valve failure
According to ISA Technical Report 96.05.01, the more than likely root causes of automated valve degradations — which may result in a course of journey — include:
Partial or intermittent sticking of hydraulic or pneumatic system elements similar to solenoids, pilots, pace controller, and so forth., due to moisture, particles or alignment issues. This causes a lack of useful margin and makes the valve slow to open or shut.
Binding, galling or other degradation of valve seats or related circulate management trim that restricts or resists valve movement.
Actuator seal degradation brought on by compression, wear or looseness that reduces the pressure obtainable to actuate the valve.
Minor injury to the valve obturator plug, disk or ball caused by system circumstances, leakage or particles, including build-up of hydrocarbon products. This causes leakage.
Complete failure of hydraulic management system components similar to solenoids, pilots, pace controller, etc., as a result of moisture, particles or alignment. The valve will fail to open or shut.
All of those conditions may be detected by a Fisher DVC6200SIS digital valve controller (Figure 3).
For example, a valve that is stuck open will exhibit itself as an increase in breakout force. Loss of seat load in comparability with when the valve meeting was new indicates potential valve leak. The Fisher DVC6200SIS additionally continuously monitors for inner faults in addition to its inputs such as supply pressure. When the DVC6200SIS sees the provision strain is simply too low, an alert is generated (Figure 4) in order that the tip consumer can take corrective actions.
pressure gauge weksler ราคา . The DVC6200SIS digital valve controller detected virtually zero supply stress, so it alerted the control system.
Other process trip advantages
Diagnostic knowledge captured during a process trip may reveal valve degradations that is probably not detected during a proof check. For instance, diagnostic data captured during a course of trip would possibly point out an issue with the valve closing completely against the total pressure of the process, which could be an early indication of valve leakage.
The valve stroke time computed by a DVC during a course of journey is extra accurate beneath real operating circumstances. This leads to a more correct SIF response time (the time from detection of an abnormal condition to ultimate component reaching its journey state), which is compared to the Process Safety Time to ensure the SIF remains to be meeting its design necessities.
Although automated valves are very dependable, failures recognized in a course of trip can provide valuable knowledge to forestall future failures. This data can help with turnaround planning by making sure the wanted components are available before turnaround even begins to doubtlessly shorten the turnaround schedule.
เกจวัดแรงอัดกระบอกสูบ of trip can provide the protection required to delay a valve’s subsequent scheduled proof test, thus saving money and time. Data captured by a DVC could be analyzed to leverage the method trip as a proof test. Even if the end user chooses not to take proof check credit for a process journey, the valve diagnostic knowledge offered by the DVC might help plant personnel make proactive valve upkeep choices..

Leave a Comment