If a valve doesn’t operate, your process doesn’t run, and that is cash down the drain. Or worse, a spurious trip shuts the process down. Or worst of all, a valve malfunction leads to a harmful failure. Solenoid valves in oil and fuel functions control the actuators that transfer large process valves, together with in emergency shutdown (ESD) techniques. The solenoid needs to exhaust air to enable the ESD valve to return to fail-safe mode whenever sensors detect a harmful process situation. These valves must be quick-acting, sturdy and, above all, reliable to prevent downtime and the associated losses that happen when a process isn’t running.
And that is much more essential for oil and gas operations the place there is limited power obtainable, such as remote wellheads or satellite tv for pc offshore platforms. Here, solenoids face a double reliability problem. First, a failure to function correctly can’t solely trigger pricey downtime, but a maintenance name to a remote location also takes longer and costs greater than a neighborhood repair. Second, to reduce back the demand for energy, many valve producers resort to compromises that truly cut back reliability. This is bad sufficient for course of valves, but for emergency shutoff valves and other security instrumented techniques (SIS), it is unacceptable.
Poppet valves are typically higher suited than spool valves for remote areas because they’re less complicated. For low-power applications, look for a solenoid valve with an FFR of 10 and a design that isolates the media from the coil. (Courtesy of Norgren Inc.)
Choosing a dependable low-power solenoid
Many elements can hinder the reliability and performance of a solenoid valve. Friction, media circulate, sticking of the spool, magnetic forces, remanence of electrical present and material characteristics are all forces solenoid valve manufacturers have to overcome to construct essentially the most reliable valve.
High spring pressure is essential to offsetting these forces and the friction they trigger. However, in low-power purposes, most manufacturers have to compromise spring pressure to allow the valve to shift with minimal energy. The discount in spring drive ends in a force-to-friction ratio (FFR) as low as 6, though the widely accepted safety degree is an FFR of 10.
Several elements of valve design play into the quantity of friction generated. Optimizing each of those permits a valve to have higher spring pressure whereas still maintaining a high FFR.
For example, the valve operates by electromagnetism — a current stimulates the valve to open, allowing the media to circulate to the actuator and move the method valve. This media may be air, but it might even be pure fuel, instrument fuel and even liquid. This is especially true in remote operations that must use whatever media is on the market. This means there’s a trade-off between magnetism and corrosion. Valves in which the media comes in contact with the coil should be made from anticorrosive supplies, which have poor magnetic properties. A valve design that isolates the media from the coil — a dry armature — permits using highly magnetized material. As a end result, there is not a residual magnetism after the coil is de-energized, which in turn allows quicker response occasions. This design also protects reliability by preventing contaminants within the media from reaching the internal workings of the valve.
Another issue is the valve housing design. Usually a heavy (high-force) spring requires a high-power coil to beat the spring energy. Integrating the valve and coil into a single housing improves efficiency by preventing power loss, allowing for the utilization of a low-power coil, resulting in less energy consumption without diminishing FFR. This built-in coil and housing design also reduces heat, stopping spurious trips or coil burnouts. A dense, thermally environment friendly (low-heat generating) coil in a housing that acts as a heat sink, designed with no air hole to entice heat around the coil, virtually eliminates coil burnout considerations and protects course of availability and safety.
Poppet valves are generally better suited than spool valves for distant operations. The lowered complexity of poppet valves increases reliability by decreasing sticking or friction factors, and decreases the variety of elements that can fail. Spool valves usually have massive dynamic seals and tons of require lubricating grease. Over time, especially if the valves are not cycled, the seals stick and the grease hardens, leading to higher friction that have to be overcome. There have been stories of valve failure due to moisture in the instrument media, which thickens the grease.
A direct-acting valve is the best choice wherever attainable in low-power environments. Not solely is the design less complex than an indirect-acting piloted valve, but also pilot mechanisms often have vent ports that can admit moisture and contamination, resulting in corrosion and permitting the valve to stay within the open place even when de-energized. Also, direct-acting solenoids are particularly designed to shift the valves with zero minimal stress requirements.
Note that some larger actuators require excessive flow rates and so a pilot operation is important. In this case, you will need to confirm that every one components are rated to the identical reliability ranking because the solenoid.
Finally, since most remote areas are by definition harsh environments, a solenoid installed there will must have robust development and be in a position to withstand and operate at extreme temperatures whereas still maintaining the same reliability and safety capabilities required in much less harsh environments.
When choosing a solenoid control valve for a distant operation, it is attainable to discover a valve that doesn’t compromise performance and reliability to minimize back energy demands. Look for เกจวัดแก๊สหุงต้ม , simple dry armature design, great magnetic and warmth conductivity properties and strong development.
Andrew Barko is the gross sales engineer for the Energy Sector of IMI Precision Engineering, makers of IMI Norgren, IMI Maxseal and IMI Herion brand elements for vitality operations. He provides cross-functional expertise in application engineering and business growth to the oil, gasoline, petrochemical and power industries and is certified as a pneumatic Specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).
Collin Skufca is the key account supervisor for the Energy Sector for IMI Precision Engineering. He presents expertise in new business development and buyer relationship management to the oil, gas, petrochemical and power industries and is certified as a pneumatic specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).
Share